Conclusions drawn by the IAEA on the basis of findings from its
verification and evaluation activities. Safeguards conclusions are
drawn for each State with a safeguards agreement in force, and,
where appropriate, for a State with a comprehensive safeguards
agreement (CSA) and an additional protocol based on [540*] in force. These conclusions are reported
collectively for States in the annual Safeguards Implementation
Report.
For each State with a safeguards agreement in force, a
conclusion is drawn relating to the nondiversion of nuclear
material placed under safeguards (and, under an INFCIRC/66-type safeguards agreement, to the
non-misuse of items specified and placed under safeguards). The
conclusion also relates to the absence of undeclared production or
separation of direct use material at reactors, reprocessing
facilities, hot cells and/or enrichment installations under
safeguards. Where there is no indication of diversion of the
nuclear material (or of misuse of specified items) placed under
safeguards or of undeclared production or separation of direct use
material at declared facilities, the conclusion is drawn for the
year concerned that the nuclear material and other items placed
under safeguards remained in peaceful nuclear activities or were
otherwise adequately accounted for.
For each State with a CSA and an additional protocol based on
[540*] in force, a broader conclusion can be
drawn for the year concerned that all of the nuclear material in
the State had been placed under safeguards and remained in peaceful
nuclear activities or was otherwise adequately accounted for. To be
able to draw this conclusion, the IAEA must draw the conclusions of
both the non-diversion of the nuclear material placed under
safeguards (as described above) and the absence of undeclared
nuclear material and activities for the State as a whole. The
conclusion of the absence of undeclared nuclear material and
activities is drawn when the activities performed under an
additional protocol have been completed, when relevant questions
and inconsistencies have been addressed, and when no indications
have been found by the IAEA that, in its judgment, would constitute
a safeguards concern.
Note: The term 'safeguards conclusions', as used here, refers
exclusively to the two conclusions drawn annually for States, as
described above. These conclusions differ from the technical
safeguards conclusions, which, according to INFCIRC 153*, are drawn by the IAEA from its
nuclear material verification activities for each material balance
area over a material balance period and reported to the State
concerned in a Statement on Conclusions.